UCLA student with beard, standing in the Royce Hall arches.

Student Spotlight – Andres Osorio

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Andres Osorio!

Andres is majoring in Political Science and is part of the Undergraduate Research Fellows Program. Andres’s project is “Today’s Voter: Examining American Voter Turnout Across Age, Race, and Ethnicity.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

I first became interested in my research project after founding VoteVotaVote, a nonpartisan, youth-led, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with the goal to maximize the impact all people can have within our political system. VoteVotaVote created bilingual (English-Spanish) civic information and voter engagement resources, and shared them via social media, in-person outreach, and partnerships with aims of dismantling barriers to participation. While we were able to civically engage people, the more I got involved, the more I began to see the underlying structure causing low levels of voter turnout for certain ages or racial and ethnic groups. My research project is the next step in my exploration of this phenomenon I witnessed and am fascinated by: differences in voter turnout across age, race, and ethnicity. This project is rooted in my experiences within my own community and observations of other communities of color in which voter turnout gaps persist.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

The most exciting aspect of my research has been the privilege it offers me to pursue learning about my interests in an environment designed for that purpose. Being able to research behavior I witnessed in my community and contextualize it with diverse scholarship has been exhilarating. The URC-HASS Undergraduate Research Fellows Program empowered my excitement through fostering a supportive and inclusive research environment allowing my research to thrive.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

What has surprised me about the research process was the formulaic nature of political science research. I was also surprised that despite this formulaic nature, there is still no “right way” to conduct research. Initially, I was daunted by how I believed my research had to look. However, as I researched and received advice from my faculty mentor, Dr. Lorrie Frasure, I realized that the research I was conducting serves to provide a new perspective to what is already known. Through this perspective, what had previously intimidated me shifted into an understanding that what I was working on had a deeper meaning, empowering me to research authentically.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

As a first-year transfer, my one piece of advice for other UCLA students, especially transfers, interested in research is: say “yes” to the resources and opportunities provided to you. When applying for the URFP program, I was in my first quarter at UCLA and felt, as so many others do, like an impostor—that I did not belong or was not qualified enough for the program. However, by taking advantage of resources offered by URC and the Library during the application process, those feelings went away as peers helped change the narrative I was telling myself, while refining my application.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I hope that my research will contribute new knowledge to fill the gaps in understanding regarding voter turnout across age, race, and ethnicity amongst U.S. adults. This research, which stands on the shoulders of many giants, hopes to use new data to examine existing theories of voter turnout to better understand their applicability to an increasingly diversifying American electorate. I hope that this research provides new contexts for organizations to mobilize voters with. But my greatest hope is that this research is used to inform policy which seeks to close age-based and racial or ethnic gaps in voter turnout.

Young woman standing in UCLA Royce Hall archese

Student Spotlight – Jade Faircloth

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Jade Faircloth!

Jade is majoring in Global Studies and minoring in Public Affairs. She is part of the UCLA/Keck Humanistic Inquiry Research Awards program. Her project is “A TWAIL Perspective on Article 98(2), U.S. Immunity Deals, and Colonial Hierarchies in International Criminal Justice.”

How did you first get interested in your research project? 

In summer 2024, I studied abroad in The Hague, where I took courses on human rights, visited the International Criminal Court (ICC), and had my first real exposure to international law. This experience ultimately led me to write my final paper for the course on the selectivity of global justice, examining how states in the Global North and Global South responded differently to the ICC’s arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Omar al-Bashir. Through this work, I became deeply interested in how eurocentrism and racism are embedded in the foundations of the ICC.   

Drawing on Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL), I am exploring how the United States’ use of Article 98(2) of the Rome Statute, through bilateral immunity agreements, exposes the limits of the ICC’s claimed universality and helps reproduce colonial hierarchies in international criminal justice. My research analyzes how the Bush administration reinterpreted Article 98(2) and utilized aid conditionality to secure immunity for U.S. nationals, using military and economic assistance as leverage and asserting U.S. exceptionalism and hegemony. In contrast, I show how many Global South states, although resistant to these agreements, faced profound structural constraints: their economic dependence and vulnerable positions in the global system limited their ability to refuse U.S. pressure, resulting in uneven sovereignty and constrained agency. This project has solidified my interest in a career in international law and human rights, where I hope to continue this line of critical, TWAIL-informed research. 

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far? 

The most exciting part of this project has been engaging deeply with TWAIL and uncovering the political calculations behind the Bush administration’s approach to bilateral immunity agreements (BIAs). It has been especially interesting to see how BIAs and the American Service-Members’ Protection Act (ASPA) were framed as national security measures within the broader “war on terror” after 9/11, even though the underlying efforts to limit U.S. exposure to the ICC began under the Clinton administration. I also find it fascinating to trace how this security framing intersected with Bush’s re-election incentives and how U.S. domestic politics shaped its hostile posture toward the ICC. At the same time, my research has highlighted how profoundly U.S. policy decisions influence the ICC’s reputation and perceived legitimacy, particularly when U.S. policy simultaneously undermines and selectively cooperates with the Court. It has also been compelling to connect these dynamics to contemporary debates about accountability within the U.S. government and the uneven enforcement of international criminal law today. Seeing how the legal architecture built in the early 2000s continues to shape present-day struggles over impunity, hegemony, and international justice has reinforced my interest in TWAIL-informed research. 

What has surprised you about your research or the research process? 

I was struck by how relevant my research feels to the present moment. I originally assumed that focusing on early 2000s U.S. policy toward the ICC, especially under George W. Bush, would be somewhat dated, but the isolationist rhetoric and anti-ICC discourse from that era still echo in today’s administration, even if in a somewhat less overt form. What surprised me most is how consistently the United States continues to adopt a skeptical, and often adversarial, stance toward the Court, and how willing it is to challenge or sidestep international norms when its own interests might be implicated. Rather than feeling historical, my project has helped me see how the legal and political frameworks built in the early years of the ICC continue to shape U.S. policy and global debates about accountability today. 

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research? 

One piece of advice I have is not to give up when you feel stuck, and to actively seek help when you hit a dead end. When I first started my project, my advisor rejected my first two proposals and pushed me to dig deeper, which ultimately led me to a much stronger research question. There were several moments when I felt completely stuck, but reaching out to others helped me see my topic from new angles. Because my project involved complex legal concepts and terminology, I contacted a UCLA Law professor who specializes in the ICC, as well as the UCLA Law Librarian. Their guidance was invaluable and made my literature review and source gathering much more manageable. 

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world? 

I hope my project highlights the structural inequalities that have been historically built into the global system and the enormous power that Western states continue to exercise. International law has largely been created by Western powers, for Western powers, and it operates through hierarchies that mirror older colonial relationships. I think a crucial starting point is recognizing the need to expand the agency of Global South states within international institutions and to acknowledge that any meaningful reimagining of international criminal law must confront the colonial logics embedded in its foundations. I also hope my research encourages students and other readers to think critically about the historical erosion and failures of global institutions, and to see how those dynamics are directly connected to the crises and legitimacy debates we face today. 

Young man in a dark suit, smiling, under the Royce Hall arches

Student Spotlight – Nicholas Fong Neuweg

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Nicholas Fong Neuweg!

Nicholas is majoring in Philosophy and is part of the UCLA/Keck Humanistic Inquiry Research Awards program. His project is “Manufacturing Testimony in a Climate of Fear: Epistemic Injustice, Institutional Power, and the Collapse of Truth in the Kern County Child Abuse Trials.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

I first became interested in this project when I was interning at the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office in the Conviction Integrity Unit. The purpose of this unit is to reevaluate past inmates’ convictions and determine if all of the information was properly searched for. As an intern, I read through letters pertaining to inmates to see if they had garnered any legitimate information that might change the outcome of their cases. Having seen thousands of stories, I have seen how the justice system which we rely on can often be faulty, having people slip through the cracks of proper justice. I wanted to identify what caused a great deal of people to be falsely accused and so I focused onto a particular instance. This led me to discovering the Kern County Trials and then my research project.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

The most exciting part has been watching a philosophical concept become a concrete investigative tool while I map the Kern County record. When I trace one “fact” backward, I can often see its earliest form start as uncertainty, then tighten through repetition and institutional framing. That transformation gives me a way to show epistemic harm without relying on broad claims, because the language changes sit directly in the sources. It also lets the project reveal structure, not just outcome, since I can pinpoint where credibility gets assigned and where doubt gets overwritten.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

I expected the biggest failures to look like blatant misconduct, yet the more unsettling pattern involves routine practices that quietly manufacture certainty—leading questions, repeated interviews, and cleaned-up summaries. I also did not expect how much discipline the process demands, since I have to resist premature conclusions long enough to separate what happened from how later accounts retell it. In other words, the work has taught me that “accuracy” often depends less on one dramatic error and more on how small procedural choices accumulate over time. The research process keeps reminding me that the record does not merely document truth; it can also produce a version of truth that later decision-makers treat as self-evident.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

As someone who had never done any formal academic research and was at first hesitant on doing so, UCLA gave the opportunity for me to not only learn how to do research through mentorship, but also a welcoming community of other people who are passionate about research. Research is often thought about primarily in the scientific field, but there are so many other fields that could be discovered.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I aspire for my research to have an impact on the way the justice system and people who are processed in said system operates. I would want people to take away from my research that no system we have currently is perfect, and it is our responsibility to always be advocates for a most just process.

Young woman in hijab and dress stands in the UCLA Royce Hall arches

Student Spotlight – Syeda Rehman

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Syeda Rehman!

Syeda is majoring in Sociology with a minor in Labor Studies. She is part of the Undergraduate Research Scholars Program. Syeda’s project is “From Growth to Displacement: Tracking the Impact of SoFi Stadium on Inglewood’s Residents and Small Businesses.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

I first became interested in my research project through Urban Sociology and Comparative and Historical Methods courses at UCLA. These classes introduced me to process-oriented mechanisms of research, where we look at causal patterns in a case study, rather than a before and after outcome. My research focuses on the city of Inglewood and the development of SoFi Stadium as a case study, examining alliances between private investors, real estate companies and local political actors. It examines how these alliances impact long-term residents and small businesses through soft eviction including rent hikes, deteriorating properties that results in displacement, and whether the promised economic boost of local hires and affordable housing becomes a reality or remains unfulfilled.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

The most exciting part of my research was the ethnographic work, where I conducted semi-structured interviews with shop owners and long-term residents, which showed me both perspectives. Some shop owners were in favor of buyout offers for their properties, while long-term tenants described facing displacement through rent hikes or eviction notices and according to them, the promises remained unfulfilled. This taught me the value of subjective experience and how there is no one-size-fits-all or one objective reality in human interaction.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

Doing my research, I felt like I was time traveling. Looking through historical documents, I traced Inglewood’s transformation from a white neighborhood to a neighborhood of color after white flight, followed by decades of disinvestment and then eventually becoming a prime case for reinvestment. What surprised me was realizing that this cycle of investment, divestment, and reinvestment is not unique to Inglewood, but reflects the history of many cities.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

One piece of advice I would give is to not be afraid of trying, even if the result is not what you expect, and to never underestimate your potential. I would encourage students to ask questions and not shy away from asking for guidance when needed. These small steps can boost our intellectual growth as students and novice researchers. I would like to thank my faculty mentors, especially my undergraduate thesis mentor, Professor Berend, for guiding me every step of the way, my graduate student advisor, Greg Kyle, for his continued support, and Dr. Reizman for believing in my research.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I hope my research can show how structural inequalities are built into our systems and how the right policy changes can prevent displacement. If policies based on tenant protection laws, such as rent stabilization, had been implemented earlier, and stronger actions or laws were enforced for affordable housing, displacement rates would have been much lower. By taking small steps toward reform through community centered policies, cities can learn to grow without forcing people out. I hope my case study can help avoid repeating the same patterns in similar divested cities like Inglewood and around the world.

A young woman in a white tshirt standing with a river and sunset behind her

Student Spotlight – Shirley Cruz

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Shirley Cruz!

Shirley is majoring in English with a minor in Professional Writing. She is part of the UCLA/Keck Humanistic Inquiry Research Awards program. Shirley’s research project is “Still in the Casket: Queer Gendered Bias in Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Sheridan Le Fanu’s Carmilla.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

I first got interested in my research project after taking a class during my first quarter here at UCLA titled “Literary Cities – Dublin.” One of the required readings for the class was Dracula by Bram Stoker, which brought me back to my longstanding interest in Gothic literature and in turn led me down a rabbit hole of other vampiric literature that has impacted our culture. One of the other vampiric works that was rarely spoken on was Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu. This disparity in scholarship written on Carmilla compared to Dracula is the focal point of the hole I found in research that I am choosing to explore.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

The most exciting aspect of my research so far has been uncovering small but meaningful details in Carmilla and Dracula that I had never noticed before, details that deepen the texts’ queer subtext and reveal how gender shapes their reception. Each new insight feels like opening a hidden door in stories I thought I already knew. I’ve also genuinely enjoyed building a strong working relationship with my advisor; having someone to share ideas with, ask questions, and discuss my discoveries has made the entire process feel collaborative, energizing, and even more rewarding.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

What surprised me about the research process was how relevant the discussion of gendered bias in literature still is today. The disparity in scholarship between queer men and queer women is a long-standing debate, but exploring it through the lens of Gothic literature has revealed new layers I didn’t expect. Seeing how Dracula and Carmilla echo these same patterns—while also diverging in fascinating ways—has made the conversation feel both current and deeply rooted in literary history.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

One piece of advice I can give other UCLA students thinking about doing research is to choose a topic that genuinely excites you, something that fires you up, because that passion will make the writing and thinking process so much easier. Research can feel intimidating, especially coming from a first-generation transfer background, but joining the research community at UCLA has opened my mind both academically and socially. It’s allowed me to connect with other students doing amazing work and build meaningful relationships with faculty, all of which has made a lasting impact on me.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

The effect that I hope my research has is to encourage a more intentional effort to recognize and represent a wider range of gender expressions in queer theory, especially female and nonbinary voices that are too often overshadowed by male-centered narratives. At UCLA and within my community, I hope this work helps reinforce the value of humanities research and inspires others to continue exploring queer stories and gender with depth and care. As current administrations place increasing pressure on academic inquiry, I hope my project—and the work of other UCLA researchers—can stand as a reminder of why this research matters and help pave the way for future generations of scholars.

A young woman wearing a dark outfit. She has dark eyes and is smiling. Her hair is dark with a slight purple hue. In the background is greenery and yellow flowers.

Student Spotlight – Natalia Castillo

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Natalia Castillo!

Natalia Castillo is majoring in Cognitive Science with a minor in Art History. She is part of the UCLA/Keck Humanistic Inquiry Research Awards program. Natalia’s research project is “Madness and Modernity: French Visual Culture and Psychiatric Discovery in the Long Eighteenth Century.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

My interest in this project began at the intersection of my studies in Cognitive Science and Art History, and my personal experiences with mental health advocacy. I’ve long been fascinated by how people have tried to visualize psychological suffering before there was language to describe it. When I started studying eighteenth-century France, I noticed how often artists depicted emotional turmoil and social disorder during times of political crisis. That overlap between visual culture and the emerging understanding of the mind drew me in. I realized that art didn’t just reflect madness—it helped define what it meant. This project became a way for me to bridge my academic interests with my desire to understand how societies make sense of mental illness and collective trauma.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

The most exciting part has been realizing how alive these artworks still feel. When I look at pieces like Lagrenée’s “La Mélancolie,” I can see how artists were trying to translate emotions that people did not yet have scientific terms for: fear, disillusionment, grief. Tracing how those emotions traveled from canvas to clinic, shaping how people thought about madness and healing, has been incredibly powerful. It is also exciting to recognize how relevant these works still are today, since the emotional exhaustion and instability they depict mirror many of the struggles we face in our own world.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

I have been most surprised by how aware eighteenth-century thinkers were of conditions we now diagnose with modern psychiatric terms. The French were deeply attuned to mental suffering and wrote and painted about melancholy, hysteria, and mania with remarkable nuance. Yet even with that awareness, the social stigma around mental illness has persisted across centuries. It is both humbling and frustrating to see how far back the struggle for legitimacy goes, and it has pushed me to think more critically about how cultural perceptions, rather than science alone, shape the way we treat mental health today.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

Start with what genuinely moves you. Research can be overwhelming and isolating at times, but if you care deeply about your question, it becomes a form of discovery rather than just a task. Do not be afraid to combine different parts of yourself, including your lived experiences, your academic interests, and your personal history. Some of the most meaningful research comes from connecting the personal with the scholarly. Most importantly, find mentors who believe in your curiosity as much as your discipline. That support makes all the difference.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I hope this project reminds people that art has always been a way to process collective pain. By showing how eighteenth-century French artists visualized madness during times of upheaval, I want to highlight how creative expression can serve as a form of healing and understanding. My goal is to challenge the lingering stigmas around mental illness by reframing it as part of our shared human experience, something that societies have grappled with, represented, and redefined for centuries. At UCLA and beyond, I hope this work encourages more interdisciplinary conversations between the arts, sciences, and mental health advocacy. Ultimately, I want people to see that care, empathy, and imagination are as essential to progress as knowledge itself.

A young woman with long dark hair standing in the UCLA Royce Hall brick arches. She is wearing a black top.

Student Spotlight – Miah Chao

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Miah Chao!

Miah Chao is majoring in Public Health and is part of the Undergraduate Research Scholars Program. Her research project is “Youth-Appealing Features in California Cannabis Advertisements: A Cross-Media Analysis of Instagram, Facebook, and Traditional Outlets.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

In my freshman year of high school, I became heavily involved in tobacco control advocacy after witnessing how addiction affected my family. Throughout this journey, I learned about the decades-long history of predatory marketing tactics used by Big Tobacco (and many other industries) to target vulnerable communities, including young people, and how this interacts with the social and structural determinants of health. As the sale of recreational cannabis expanded, I began to recognize similar marketing strategies in my community. Considering California has relatively unclear regulations surrounding youth-appealing cannabis marketing, I grew curious: What specific features of these advertisements appeal to young audiences? How do messaging strategies differ across platforms? And what might this mean for policy and prevention efforts? These questions have led to my current research examining youth-appealing marketing strategies across digital and traditional media, bridging marketing, psychology, and public health.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

Examining the advertisements themselves and realizing the range of messaging represented. The cannabis industry, by far, does not take a “one-size fits all” approach and has vast diversity in messaging strategies, ranging from emphasizing the health and wellness aspects of cannabis to tying it to enticing flavors, pops of color, and even fantasy football. It has been interesting to try to break these strategies down and see patterns emerge!

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

When beginning my platform comparison analyses, I was originally expecting Instagram to have the highest prevalence of youth-appealing features, given its popularity with young people. However, early-stage results showed that Facebook actually had the highest prevalence, more frequently using rewarding appeals and risky content related to addiction.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

Find a mentor at UCLA that can champion your work! I went into UCLA with an ultra-specific topic that I was interested in, but I was still able to find incredible mentors here. Not only were they interested in the same topics, but they also were willing to train me so I could build appropriate skillsets, connect me with opportunities to share and elevate my work, and enable me to transform my questions into formalized research. Do some digging online, leverage any connections you may have, and don’t be afraid to reach out!

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I would love for my research to inform reasonable, evidence-based marketing regulations for the cannabis industry, especially in digital spaces that go largely unregulated. By studying the messaging strategies used by various industries, we can design more appropriate prevention campaigns catered to younger, vulnerable populations. I also hope my work spreads the message of the importance of learning from past mistakes of other industries, like the tobacco industry, and using public health policy to tackle upstream factors connected to health problems.

 

 

 

A young blond woman sits on a white wicker bench in front of a gray stucco wall. She is wearing a blue and white sleeveless blouse and and white pants. Her arms are folded in her lap and her hair is loosely pulled back. She is smiling and her head is cocked to the side.

Student Spotlight – Brinn Wallin

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Brinn Wallin!

Brinn is majoring in English and is part of the UCLA/Keck Humanistic Inquiry Undergraduate Research Awards program. Brinn’s research project is “The Enduring Phantom of Sylvia Plath: Misrepresentation and a Life Survived by Death.”

How did you first get interested in your research project?

My discovery of and love for Sylvia Plath began at a quintessential time in my life, and one that I view as somewhat of a synchronicity. I first picked up her only novel, The Bell Jar, as I was being discharged from a mental health facility. Though the basis of my hospitalization was different from Plath’s (as well as Esther Greenwood’s in this novel), there were several poignant similarities in our struggles. I started reading her poetry, specifically her earliest poems, which doubled my interest in her. However, I began to notice something while studying Plath and her work in academia: she was known, above all, by her suicide. This repeated focus on her death, more than her immense work and influence, spawned a desire in me to research this misrepresentation of her life, work, and legacy. In doing so, my frustrations deepened as my passion grew. When I transferred to UCLA, I applied to an introductory research program to legitimize what has now been my years-long research journey. This research has made up the most prized and essential part of my years as an undergraduate student.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

Everything! If I had to narrow it down to one thing, though, I would say the most exciting aspect of my research is the same thing that overwhelms me: the endless rabbit holes of information, insight, and inquiry that the process of researching yields. I love learning; to me, research is, first and foremost, about learning and fostering personal (and social) growth.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

I knew when I first started research what I was getting myself into. Nevertheless, you can never anticipate just how much or how little information you will discover, depending on what specific questions you are asking. At certain points I have found an abundance of scholarly work to support my claims. At others, I could find near to nothing. This is the special part of research, however: the opportunity to build off of the work of previous researchers, while also discovering one’s own unique place within a particular area of scholarship.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

First I would say: do it! But I would follow that by emphasizing the importance of loving what you research. If you take on a project just to say you did it, or because you view it as just another thing you have to do, I don’t think that it is reason enough to sign yourself up. One of my favorite authors and artists, Anaïs Nin, writes that it is passion which lends us moments of wholeness. This, at least to me, is what sits at the core of research: moments, even if brief ones, that fuel our souls.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

Given that my project specifically addresses real-time changes that can be made in the discourse surrounding Sylvia Plath, I hope my research widens the academic lens focused on this larger-than-life (and death!) writer and woman. I hope it allows for greater transformation in the ways we view and treat female artists altogether. And I hope my project positively impacts those who know of Plath, have read her work, or simply heard her name once in passing. In other words, I hope the love I have for her becomes contagious.

 

Tags: Keck, English, Creative Writing, Sylvia Plath, Undergraduate Research, Undergraduate Creativity

 

 

Student Spotlight – Nat Escobedo

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Nat Escobedo!

Nat majors in Chicanx Studies and Art, minors in Art History, and is a part of the Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellowship.

Her project, “Community Art in the Inland Empire,” aims to be accessible to as many different audiences as possible, and ultimately be made from and for the community.

How did you first get interested in your research project?

I’m from the Inland Empire, grew up in the High Desert, and had the incredible opportunity to work at the Cheech Center for Chicano Art when it opened! The community I was able to get involved with in the I.E, and the conversations we were having are my reason for being here.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

I love talking about my research and getting the opportunity to highlight the amazing work being done by the community in the Inland Empire. It’s always exciting when I talk to someone and they go from not even knowing where the I.E is to wanting to go visit some of the art shows there.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

I’m surprised at how few people know where the I.E is…or people thinking it’s in Los Angeles…

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

Anyone can do research, and everyone is doing research all of the time. Every time you ask yourself a question, it’s research. The only difference between Googling how a toaster works and a research project is a bibliography.

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I hope to challenge some of the norms of how research is conducted and written. Often, the communities we have a responsibility to are not centered, if at all considered, in our processes of knowledge production. I want my research to be accessible to as many different audiences, and ultimately be made from and for the community. Also recognizing that communities like mine aren’t usually included in art histories, I hope I can continue to participating in actively changing that by sharing our counter-stories beyond our marginalization.

Student Spotlight – Madison Bishop

/in /by

Meet UCLA undergraduate researcher Madison Bishop!

Madison majors in Psychology, minors in Applied Developmental Psychology, and is a part of the UCLA/Keck Humanistic Inquiry Undergraduate Research Awards program. Her project, “From Hearing to Understanding: How Parent’s Language Impacts Children’s Emotion Categorization,” aims to share information that will help families and early childcare centers better support children’s emotional and social-cognitive development.

How did you first get interested in your research project?

I first got interested in my project when exploring the difference between children’s emotion categorization abilities in the Language and Cognitive Development Lab. I was fascinated by what factors may have contributed to some children being better at categorizing different emotions such as happy, sad, and angry.

What has been the most exciting aspect of your research so far?

The most exciting aspect of my research so far has been the freedom of developing my own project. I have enjoyed setting a timeline and holding myself accountable.

What has surprised you about your research or the research process?

I have been most surprised by the amount of diverse research that is out there. It has been interesting to find several articles that support my hypothesis, but then also stumble upon one that completely contradictions it.

What is one piece of advice you have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research?

My biggest piece of advise I have for other UCLA students thinking about doing research is to reflect on what topics you find the most fascinating. Research is a very time-consuming and tedious process, so you want to make sure that what you are learning about excites you!

What effect do you hope your research has in your field, at UCLA, in your community, or in the world?

I hope my research will have a lasting positive impact on the field of developmental psychology. Through my project, I aim to share information that will help families and early childcare centers better support children’s emotional and social-cognitive development.